Houma-Terrebonne Housing Authority
Board of Commissioners Regular Meeting
The regular meeting for the Houma-Terrebonne Housing Authority was held March 26, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. in Senator Circle at 124 K Senator Circle, Houma, Louisiana.
Chairperson Hebert called the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners to order at 3:00 p.m. followed by the Invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairperson Hebert stated that this is the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners.
Upon roll call, the following Commissioners were recorded as present:
Commissioners: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
Absent: None
Also present: Mrs. Nikita Gilton, Executive Director, Ms. Naquada Jefferson; Mr. Brandon Decuir, Legal, Mrs. Tiffany Stokes, Housing Supervisor, Ms. Tamara Matthews, Procurement, Justin Coleman, Maintenance; and Mr. Dean Duplantier, Broadmoor Design Group
Continuing with the agenda, Item #4, Order of the Day/ Approval of Agenda; Mrs. Gilton said the agenda will proceed as published.
Continuing with the agenda, Item #5, Public Comment; There were no speaker cards.
Continuing with the agenda, Item #6, Approval of Minutes from January 26, 2026, regular board meeting; motioned to approve by Vice Chairperson Picou, seconded by Commissioner Sherman. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item #7, Bills and Communications, Item #7A, Approval of Pay
Vouchers for the period of January 23, 2026-March 19, 2026; motioned to approve by Vice Chairperson Picou, seconded by Commissioner Burke. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item #7B, Monthly Financials-December 2025; Item #7B1, Memo from Fee Accountant to Board of Commissioners; Item #7B2, Balance Sheet for December 2025; Item #7B3,Income and Expense Statements for December 2025; Item #7B4,Public Housing Financial Assessment Score for the month of December 2025; Item #7B5,Bank Reconciliation.
Continuing with the agenda, Item #8, Report of the Secretary / Executive Director—Agency Update; The update is in their packets. They all received a copy of the audit. It was complete in January by Smith Marion. The audit showed no finding. A letter from Mrs. Elvettra Gibbs, HUD Director, was also received.
The audit in Eunice will be complete on March 31st. She has been working with them to finish their audit. In the next month or two, an RFP will go out for Duson Audit. This is the first year Mrs. Gilton will be doing an audit for Duson. That agency did not have any funding to draw down. Moving forward, an audit will be done there.
In January, Mrs. Gilton reported that the last call with FEMA, which Mr. Decuir was on the call as well, was in December. The agency has received a new PDMG. Right now, the government is shut down, therefore, she has no FEMA update.
The fence and the boarding up at Duson Housing Authority is complete.
Mr. Dean will provide an update on the demo plan for Bayou Towers. Hopefully, when FEMA comes back, she will know if it can be demo. When she spoke to Mr. Eddie Williams, an email was sent that was little contradicting because they were still assessing Bayou Towers as a repair but can move forward with demolition. Repair and demo should not be used in the same sentence. Until an ok from FEMA completely saying Bayou Towers is over the 50%, then she will move forward. The demo plan is being worked on because it has to be completed no matter what because HUD approved that building to be demo.
Mrs. Gilton applied for shortfall funding in 2024 HTHA. About a month ago, the agency was approved for it. That can help with different things going on with the agency. It was for 2023.
Mrs. Gilton asked if they had any questions on anything. There was none.
Mr. Duplantier reported that they continue to progress the cataloging of the environmental things they need to address when they demolish the building, establishing what they think is the most appropriate protocol to be applied when they take the building down and looking at how they can certainly minimize the impact on the neighbors. They are about 70%-75% complete on the documents defining that. They have done some initial planning on studies on how to potentially redevelop the site with replacement housing units. Mr. Duplantier asked if anybody had any questions. There were none. Mrs. Gilton asked if there were any questions regarding the demo plan. There were none.
Continuing with the agenda, Item #9, reminder of State of Louisiana requirement that all public servants (HTHA employees and board members) receive one hour of ethics training each year; Chairperson Hebert asked if that was by May for the ethics training. Mrs. Gilton said by December. Chairperson Hebert asked about the link. Mrs. Gilton said it is in the packet.
Continuing with the agenda, Item 10, Reminder to HTHA Board of Commissioners completing the annual Tier 2.1 Personal Financial Disclosure Statement on or before May 15, 2026; Chairperson Hebert said that is the one she was thinking of.
Continuing with the agenda, Item 11, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. D-1083-26, adopting Duson Housing Authority Fiscal Year 2026 Operating Budget for FY beginning 4/01/2026 and ending 3/31/2027. Mrs. Gilton said that is in the packet. Now they will see funding at Duson; not as much as HTHA because there is only 30 units. Now the 5-year action plan is rolling. Motioned by Commissioner Sherman, seconded by Commissioner Burke. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item 12, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. D-1084-26, authorizing advertisement for public review and 45-day comment period, the Duson Housing Authority’s Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan and Five-Year Plan. Mrs. Gilton said that is in the packet as well. It is shorter than what is has been in the past with the new housing portal. It’s only 3 pages. All the stuff that was required in the past is not. She said same for the next one, Houma Terrebonne. It’s a three-page annual action plan and five-year action plan that HUD requires the ED’s to go in the system and do. It’s basic stuff, the fiscal year, how many units. Mrs. Gilton said for Duson it is going to be at the mayor’s office. When she goes that way next week, she is going to drop of the PHA Plan. If any of the residents in Duson have any questions, they can write it down, write comments. It is the same thing here. It is posted in the office. If there are any questions, she would come out and answer. If they go to the mayor’s office in Duson, he would get her on the phone if there are question. Duson does not have a physical office. Motioned by Vice Chairperson Picou, seconded by Commissioner Burke. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item 13, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. 1085-26, authorizing advertisement for public review and 45-day comment period, the Houma Terrebonne Housing Authority’s Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan and Five-Year Plan. Mrs. Gilton said it’s basically the same thing. With the five-year action plan, that is the capital fund money. When you are reviewing the plan and you do not see stuff with the insurance proceeds, that is not what the plan is for. It is for the upkeep of the property, to maintain year by year. In there, you will see demolition because they have to demo some of the buildings. For a rebuild, HUD requires the use of insurance proceeds. Until the FEMA process is finished, the insurance proceeds cannot be used. She said the capital fund money cannot be used until the insurance proceeds is used. Chairperson Hebert said that is why they are stuck right now, waiting on FEMA. Mrs. Gilton said FEMA has to bridge the gap. The agency did not have enough insurance coverage. Motioned by Commissioner Sherman, seconded by Vice Chair Picou. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item 14, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. 1086-26, proclaiming May 6, 2026 as State Employee Recognition Day. Mrs. Gilton said that would be for the employees, like what is done every year. Mrs. Tamara sends letters out to different vendors and contractors for donations to help assist with donations, so it would not be so much on the agency. She is going to do something nice for them, seafood, cooked meals and get some sweets, like she usually does. Motioned by Vice Chairperson Picou, seconded by Commissioner Burke. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Mrs. Gilton told the Commissioners they are welcome to come.
Continuing with the agenda, Item 15, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. 1087-26, Approval and Authorization to select Proposal to Request for Proposals for Grant and Management and Project Management Resolution No. 1087-26. Mrs. Gilton said they have all the proposals in front of them. It was eight companies that submitted a bid. The reason it was not in the packet when they went out because it closed on last week Thursday. On Friday, Tamara or Naquada goes to the p.o. box to make sure we do not have any that is postmarked and they would have come on time. On Monday and Tuesday, staff rated the ones received. CSRS is the one that she is recommending per their evaluation. The staff does the evaluation. Chairperson Hebert said they had the highest score. Mrs. Gilton said yes. If you go down the spreadsheet, it list the points for evaluation criteria. Mrs. Gilton said she makes a recommendation to the board. They can discuss it here or however they want to do it. In order to select someone, it has to be board approved. Mrs. Gilton said she can’t tell them who to select. She is just making a recommendation based off the points received.
Commissioner Boykin asked who were the employees that rated the vendors. Mrs. Gilton said Naquada, Tamara, Tiffany and Justin. Commissioner Boykin asked how many local companies were there that participated. Chairperson Hebert said she thinks it was just one. He said what he means by local, Chairperson Hebert asked Houma? Vice Chairperson Picou said if they turned in a proposal, they would look at it. Chairperson Hebert said they had one from Terrebonne. She believes that is what he is asking. Commissioner Boykin said he was asking how many local turned them in. How many local vendors. Mrs. Gilton said one, All South. Commissioner Boykin said what he means is by the state of Louisiana or Terrebonne Parish. Mr. Decuir said he was talking about local to Louisiana. Mrs. Gilton said they did not write down if they were in state or out of state. That wasn’t one of the things on there. Mrs. Gilton said she does not have them in front of her. Chairwoman Hebert said CSRS is New Orleans, the one that is rated the highest. Commissioner Boykin said he asked because he supports local. That is the reason why he asked that question. He said he called the office and thinks he spoke to Ms. Jefferson; he knew the time was close and he wanted to find out who won and that is when she gave him that information and that is who it was. Mrs. Gilton said they do not win. The board has to vote. He said that’s what he meant, for that process, who was chosen but he knows the board has to vote. Mrs. Gilton said she think there was one out of state. Chairperson Hebert said they all seem to be local. Vice Chairperson Picou said probably Baton Rouge or New Orleans. Mrs. Gilton said that is in state. He was saying in state. Mrs. Gilton asked Mrs. Jefferson if they had somebody from a different state. Chairwoman Hebert said that is what she is looking for right now. She said she just went through all of them and they all are Louisiana. She said maybe this one?
Commissioner Boykin asked if there were any minority companies that participated. Mrs. Jefferson said yes.
Chairwoman Hebert said for clarification, when you rate them, what does the points determine. Mrs. Gilton asked Mr. Decuir, would she be able to call them up because she does not do the ratings. Chairwoman Hebert said she knows, she is just asking. Mr. Decuir said there is rubric. It works from zero to 100. Depending on where the emphasis are for what they are looking for, 30 points may be given to prior experience, 10 points may be given for whether they worked in the area or have worked with these types on entities that are soliciting the services and then it totals at the end. Commissioner Boykin said so it’s different categories, is what he is saying. Mr. Decuir said yes. He said he did not look at the rubric for this particular one. Commissioner Boykin said something this important rather than coming head on with it, he would like to have more time to look at it. It’s a lot of information that they are talking about. He said he is asking that they be given the information, not at the meeting but prior to the meeting, where they can go over it. The one that was selected, he looked them up and the information that he got was that that company was sold back in June of last year to Westwood. Mr. Decuir said there is a merger between the two. Commissioner Boykin said it is ongoing. Mr. Decuir said it is ongoing. Commissioner Boykin said what he is saying is he found that information out today when he found out the one that will be the one submitted. Mr. Decuir said to Commissioner Boykin, if he can briefly address his concern about the timing of this. If he recalls, they separated with the former program administrator and grants manager. They did not have a lot of time to allow for a more extended review because as soon as the federal government refunds Homeland or whoever has FEMA underneath it, he forgets which one it is, they have to hit the ground running because the projects are stalled out. There was an effort behind timing to have this aligned for this board meeting. Mr. Decuir said to Commissioner Boykin that he understands his concerns as it relates to those that submitted proposals. He knows the name CSRS. He did not see the rest submitted. He also understands that CSRS is providing the same program administration and management to Terrebonne Parish. So, they are here. They are local which he thinks also provided some experience that he thinks was helpful to the agency in navigating both, the element within government, Terrebonne Parish and moving forward.
Mr. Gilton said from being the ED, every time she goes to a HUD or federal training, she knows they are from Terrebonne Parish, but they can’t just say they are going to cater and keep it local because this is federal funding as well. Until Commissioner Boykin said about the merger, she thought they were still local. Staff or nobody that does the elevation process can say we’re going to hire somebody because they are local. She told Vice Chairperson Picou that she knows they have discussed it previously. Vice Chairperson Picou said yes. Mrs. Gilton said it is federal funds. She said she understands they are in Terrebonne Parish, they are not supposed to say they are going to hire local because it is federal money. They are a little bit different from what the Parish can and would do. This is federal money, even though located in Terrebonne Parish. Commissioner Boykin said he understands what she is saying but he is saying that is how he feel. That is his opinion. That’s all.
Chairwoman Hebert asked if they move forward with a motion today. Mrs. Gilton said it is up to the board. Mr. Decuir said it is on the agenda for today but if they want to discuss it. Commissioner Boykin said what happened the last time, because he knows they were involved in the bidding process when they chose that other company. The board members were involved in the process. With the board members being involved with the process, he believes as a whole, the majority of them would be on the same page. Mrs. Gilton said the previous consultant that is one of the things they wanted to involve the board in. Usually when they do the evaluations, they don’t. Commissioner Boykin said that is why he asked that. Mrs. Gilton said previously, the consultants said they wanted to do it that way. The way it happened, it had to be canceled because there were some things that were not covered and wasn’t supposed to move forward. Moving forward, there will be a consultant that is in place and the consultant is supposed to. Mrs. Gilton said she reached out to Mr. Dean and asked him what Broadmoor, in the future, would want to do that. She does not want anybody to say she, staff or the board, favored anyone. Consultants will be in place and Broadmoor will be in place. Moving forward, whoever is selected, they are going to cover it and Broadmoor. She does not want them in it, if they do not have to be. They will give a recommendation. She will come to the board and say, whoever recommended XY&Z. That is what she will present to the board. Commissioner Boykin said he was just wondering because they were not told at the time they did it. Mrs. Gilton asked what? Commissioner Boykin said that the consultant made the recommendation that they get involved in the process. Mrs. Gilton said oh. Mr. Decuir asked if he talking about the construction bid. Commissioner Boykin said yes, that is what he is talking about. They all came and she basically said it was a recommendation of the consultant. He is saying, at the time, as a board member, they did not know that at the time. They wasn’t told that is all he is saying. Mrs. Gilton said moving forward she will make sure they are all clear and on one page. Commissioner Boykin said if they were told that, he would not have asked that question. Mrs. Gilton said right, understandable.
Mr. Decuir asked if there were any questions particular to any one proposal that they had. Commissioner Boykin said no, he means it’s a lot of information and just walk in the door and go along with the recommendation. He is only one board member. He can honestly say he cannot support that because the thinks it is too important. It’s a lot of information to go over, with it not being in the packet, walking in today and just voting for the sake of voting, that’s just him as a board member. Commissioner Boykin said he serves on a lot of boards. Don’t put something before him right before it is time to vote because that hasn’t given him adequate time to review it. Mr. Decuir said he understand. Commissioner Boykin said it’s easy to come to a meeting and say yes, I support it and move on. He tries to make sure when he votes that he have all the knowledge and information that he has. It was reasonable concern. It is not anything off the wall that does not make sense. Mrs. Gilton said she agrees with what he is saying. Also, she feels like the people that evaluated, she found the employees here. She feels like that her staff knows that they need somebody that is good at the grant writing and project management. This is all their jobs on the line. She does not see them not making the right decision to help the housing authority. She respects what Commissioner Boykin is saying but she feels that staff has the best interest of the housing authority. Commissioner Boykin said it is not a concern about her staff. It’s a check and balance. The situation does not have anything to do with not trusting the staff or this or that. It is as a board member to vote on a situation that you have all the knowledge that you need to make an intelligent rather than putting this paper before him before he sit down and say I need you to vote on this proposal. This is what the staff did. He said it’s a lot. If it wasn’t something they could do simple, yes. He said this is not about anyone of her staff or her. It’s about the process, taking the time to read and look at what you are voting one. He is just one.
Vice Chairperson Picou said if he is right, he could make a motion to table this right now and come back at a certain date and look at it again; so, somebody make a motion that we do that. Chairperson Hebert said they could call an emergency meeting and they won’t have to wait two months. Mr. Decuir said they are able to meet virtually, so they can convene at a subsequent meeting by phone. He asked how much time do they think they need to review the proposal to come back. Commissioner Boykin said a couple of days. He is not saying two or three months. It’s a lot of information. Mr. Decuir said the only reason he is asking, if they want to do it via zoom, Chairwoman Hebert would have to show up here. The way that zoom meetings work, if that is something they want to do, it’s permitted under state law, it’s whomever that is going to chair or preside the meeting has to be what’s called the anchor location. This would be the anchor location. Chairwoman Hebert said she would not want to wait too long. Vice Chairperson Picou said his deal on that is if they delay it, his suggestion right now is not more than two weeks on this, period. Mr. Decuir said they will run into a little bit of a holiday situation, which is why he is asking how much time they think they need. If they can reconvene in a week or less that will be taken them into, a traditional Friday holiday. Some people may also take the Monday. That will then put them out almost two weeks, if they tried to wait until after Easter. Nobody can predict what the federal government is going to do. They still have to negotiate a contract. Other than accepting the proposal, we know the schedule of charges, they still have to enter into and find some measure of a written agreement with them. That it is going to take a little bit of time too. Whomever is selected. Mr. Decuir wants to make sure when the feds reopen, at least Homeland, that FEMA falls underneath, that whoever the PA grants administrator PA is able to pick up a line immediately.
Chairperson Hebert asked Vice Chairperson Picou what day next week would be good for him. Vice Chairperson Picou said he would have to look at his calendar. Every day is hard to say. Mr. Decuir said to Commissioner Boykin, if he want to make a motion for a special meeting to be held virtually with a date to be set by no later than tomorrow that way everybody can get back to their respective calendar and confirm it, if that works. Commissioner Boykin asked how many days was he talking about. Mr. Decuir said he think right now they are talking about no later than next week. Commissioner Boykin asked what day would that be. Mr. Decuir said April 1st. He said they could do the Thursday but the Thursday gets as precarious as the Friday. He said really, they are looking at Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday as the available dates. Chairperson Hebert asked Vice Chairperson Picou if he was available Monday
Vice Chairperson Picou stepped out at 3:32p.m to make a phone call. Vice Chairperson Picou returned at 3:34p.m. Chairperson Hebert said Vice Chairperson Picou was good for Monday if that works for everyone. Mr. Decuir said they can do it Monday morning, unless they just wanted to do 3:00 or a preferred time. Vice Chairperson Picou said if they want to move it, then do it Monday and they can do it at 8:00a.m. or 9:00a.m. in the morning, so he can get out for 10:30a.m. Mr. Decuir said Commissioner Boykin said after 12:00p.m. Vice Chairperson said he can not make it after 12:00p.m. Mr. Decuir asked Commissioner Boykin if he could do 8:00a.m. Commissioner Boykin said he will be out of town. Chairperson Hebert said they might have to do a Tuesday. Vice Chairperson Picou said just forget it, he would be there. Mr. Decuir asked if, he was sure. He said yes. Mr. Decuir said Monday or Tuesday. Chairperson Hebert and Vice Chairperson Picou said Monday. Mr. Decuir said Monday at noon. He said they have to do a motion to table it until March 31st at noon. It can be set up virtual or show up in person. Mr. Decuir said it would be set up as a virtual meeting, if they are here and able to attend, you can attend in person but it will be called as a virtual meeting because there is a certain process they have to do and it gives them the flexibility on if they can be there or not be there. You either just have to hit the link and come in or you will be here in person. Mrs. Gilton asked Chairwoman Hebert if she would be able to get on. Chairwoman Hebert said she won’t be able to. She asked if she had to. Mrs. Gilton said if it’s tie, she is the tie breaker. Mr. Decuir asked Chairwoman Hebert when she comes back. She said the next Sunday. Mr. Decuir asked what about April 7th? He asked if they just wanted to push it until after Easter. Vice Chairperson Hebert said whatever they want to do. Commissioner Boykin said April 7th would be good. Chairwoman Hebert asked what day of the week is that. Mr. Decuir said that is a Tuesday. Chairwoman Hebert said Tuesday is fine with her. Vice Chairperson Picou asked what time? Mr. Decuir said if they want a virtual option, they have to declare it that way. Chairwoman Hebert said if they are all in town, she doesn’t know why they all just can’t come. She asked if 10:00a.m. would be ok with everybody. Chairwoman Hebert said someone needs to make a motion that they are tabling this until Tuesday, April 7th. Commissioner Boykin motioned that they have a special meeting April 7th, 10:00a.m. at this location; seconded by Commissioner Burke. Commissioner Sherman asked what date is that. Chairwoman Hebert said April 7th. It’s a Tuesday, 10:00a.m, right here. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item 16, Discussion and possible action relative to Resolution No. 1088-26, Authorization to Enter into Purchase Option Contract. Vice Chairperson Picou asked for an explanation. Mr. Decuir said on the option contract, what the have is a parcel of property that has been identified that may be a suitable location to use for reconstruction and or further development by the housing authority. The option is to complete a due diligence on the property. The reason for the option is it’s going to take a little bit of time to get either survey or site inspection confirmation on zoning as well as infrastructure needs at the parcel. The property is on the market. They would allow them to kind of lock it down while they do the investigation. If for whatever reason, as they do their diligence, if it is not favorable, they can let go of the option and they are free to chose the next person that may be looking to purchase the property. Right now, HTHA would be the first to have the right to purchase the property based on the conditions of review of the site.
Commissioner Boykin asked where is the property. Mr. Decuir said it’s at 90 and Mrs. Gilton said about two or three lots before Wallace Thibodaux Estates. It’s right under five acres. Commissioner Boykin asked if it was on Terrebonne or Lafourche side. Mrs. Gilton said Terrebonne.
Mr. Decuir said the property is in its natural state. It does not look like anything has ever been built, stored or really maintained on the property as part of a sugarcane farm at some point. The owners are trying to move it. What he does not want them to do is to go take the next available buyer until they can do some due diligence based on what they might be trying to do with the property versus somebody else just holding it for whatever small business they got. He anticipates that it would take about 90 to 120 days to get confirmation on everything that they need. And then at that point, either they come back and present a purchase contract to the board for purchasing the property or say that they will not purchase the property because various conditions that the consultants or whomever they get to do the inspection. Mr. Gilton said she showed Mr. Dean the property a few weeks ago. He is going to do some research as well on the property. She can bring that information back to the board as well. Motion to look at by Vice Chairperson Picou, seconded by Commissioner Sherman. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Picou, D. Sherman, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Continuing with the agenda, Item 17, Commissioner Comments; Chairwoman Hebert wished everyone a Happy Easter.
Continuing with the agenda, Item 18, Next Regular Board meeting is scheduled for May 28, 2026, 3:00 p.m., 124 K Senator Circle; Houma, LA 70363.
Continuing with the agenda, Item #19, Adjournment; Motioned to approve by Commissioner Boykin, seconded by Vice Chairperson Picou. Chairperson Hebert called for the vote:
UPON ROLL CALL THERE WAS RECORDED
YEAS: J. Boykin, D. Sherman, D. Picou, G. Burke and C. Hebert
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: None
ABSENT: None Motion carried
Meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m.